Sunday, December 23, 2007


The real purpose of abortion? Extermination of the Negro race, according to Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. As I've said many times, the Democrat Party hates black people with a hatred that is so sublime and pervasive that it is beyond the comprehension of those outside the Party.

Friday, December 7, 2007

Reading the Institutes

Calvin did not doubt that the objective world was enough to prove that God exists. But man is so damaged by sin that this testimony is not enough and this is why God reveals himself in his Word. My question - or observation - those who claim that it is enough to see God in his creation are actually saying that they neither need nor believe his Word. Are these people simply saying that there is no sin, that Man is not fallen and does indeed have the capacity and ability to know God solely through his creation?

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Ingredients of a liberal

The first necessary ingredient for a liberal is a belief in larger government. Particularly at the federal level. Liberals embrace an all-powerful, centralized government. Liberals oppose state's rights and a smaller, less centralized federal government. This is the foundational cornerstone of liberalism. The best example of a state where the ideals of liberalism were most completely realized was the Soviet Union. Liberals commemorate the ideals of the perfect liberal, Vladimir Lenin, by holding their Earth Day festival on his birthday every year. It is most appropriate that they call his birthday celebration “Earth Day” for liberalism can only survive if it is accepted by the whole earth. Whenever there is a competing ideology, liberalism will ultimately fail for any ideology is better than liberalism.

The second necessary ingredient for a liberal is a belief in foreign aid and foreign entanglements. American sovereignty is of little value to a true liberal. The liberal mandate is in favor of an invasive military empire. The current occupation of Iraq is just the latest example of a liberal ideology applied to foreign policy for liberals believe that real security is based on meddling in the affairs of other nations.

The third necessary ingredient is a belief in a "living Constitution". A liberal prefers to override the Constitution through legislation rather than amendment. The passage of the USA-Patriot Act established pretty firmly just how many liberals there are in Washington DC.

A fourth necessary ingredient to liberalism is a denigration of traditional values. Traditional values are constant reminders of the better days before 1917 when liberalism did not exist. Traditional values also serve as a reminder that a belief in the rule of law is a belief in the greater good. Since the liberal does not believe in rule of law (see third necessary ingredient) he must be opposed to anything that engenders belief in rule of law, such as traditional values. The liberal’s only use for traditional values would be in exploiting them for seizure of power. This is one of the main ingredients of the Republican Party’s liberalism: they are more interested in exploiting Christianity for the seizure of power than they are in protecting the religious rights of the individual.

Labels: ,

Saturday, December 1, 2007

Abraham Lincoln

I have often heard that Abraham Lincoln mentioned the Corwin Amendment (the original 13th amendment) in his first inaugural address. I finally have gotten around to fact-checking this and have discovered that he did indeed:

"I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service. To avoid misconstruction of what I have said, I depart from my purpose not to speak of particular amendments so far as to say that, holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable."

The Great Emancipator? Had no objection to an amendment to the Constitution that made slavery permanent? With no hope of abolition? Hmmm. It's amazing what you can find out if you go to primary sources, isn't it? Hear the man in his own words and not through the reconstructionist Yankee filter and you can't help but reach a different conclusion than is taught in the Yankee government schools of 2007. Unless, of course, you prefer to believe the Yankee government over the words of Abraham Lincoln himself, which, I understand, is quite plausible in the occupied reconstructed South of today.

While he undoubtedly spoke the truth when referring to his desire to make slavery permanent, America's Hitler lied when he spoke these words:

"In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. You have no oath registered in heaven to destroy the Government, while I shall have the most solemn one to "preserve, protect, and defend it."

The Government did indeed assail us. It burned Columbia. It burned Atlanta. It burned Richmond. We did not burn one single Yankee city. We did not rape one single Yankee woman, unlike the Yankee army that raped our black women whenever and wherever they encountered them. Lincoln also got his own oath wrong: the oath he took was to preserve, protect and defend THE CONSTITUTION not the "government." Another fact overlooked by the revisionist Yankee educators in our reconstructed South of 2007.

To anyone who complains of the "war" in Iraq: Why are you surprised? This is the Yankee army doing what it has always done. Nothing has changed. Rape, murder, burn, pillage...Yankees are barbarians and they are only doing what comes natural to them.