Sunday, April 12, 2009


My Political Views
I am a right moderate social libertarian
Right: 6.92, Libertarian: 1.69

Political Spectrum Quiz

Letter to HusseinObama

When you say "I want to work to make abortions less necessary, which means sex education and birth control.", what do you really mean? Do you mean teaching abstinence as part of a sex education curriculum? I think not! That's the LAST thing you'd ever want as a part of sex education. Am I wrong? Or do you have the GUTS to admit it? When you say "I want to work to make sure that, when life is brought forward, we have prenatal care and postnatal care and childcare and universal health care and a living wage.", what does this mean? That you want the United States to be a communist country, with a command economy instead of a free-market, capitalist one? Again, do you have the GUTS to admit it? And what do you mean when you say "And because I know that the right to choose is under attack -- as President, I will only support someone for the Supreme Court if he or she agrees to uphold Roe v. Wade."? The right to choose? Where is that right given in our Constitution? Show me and I'll support you. You can't...but do you have the GUTS to admit it? The woman's so-called right to choose is exercised when she chooses to have sex. Once she is pregnant, choice is OVER. Abortion is murder. Again, do you have the GUTS to admit it?

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Aggressive Incompetence

A/I doesn't mean Artificial Intelligence now stands for Aggressive Incompetence. So far, it is only being used by Barack Obama. It may begin and end with him as it becomes clear how pervasive a liability it is.

Barack Obama will improve George Bush's legacy even more than George Bush improved Bill Clinton's legacy.

What a bummer for the phony George Bush haters. They voted for the only thing that could have improved his legacy, the only thing that could have rescued him from the dustbin of presidential history. They voted for the only man who had the incompetence to replace George Bush as the worst president in U.S. history. What a bummer. Not being a phony George Bush hater, but a real George Bush hater, I didn't vote for Obama. I voted for a man who would have kept George Bush in the presidential basement: Bob Barr. Now, thanks to the phony George Bush haters, Bush gets out of the basement and all will be forgotten as the only thing people will remember now is the idiot Obama.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Martin's dream is dead

"I expect to be judged by results. I'm not going to make any excuses. If stuff hasn't worked and people don't feel like I've led the country in the right direction, then you'll have a new president." ----Barak Obama

Poor fella. His expectations will never be met because few, if any, of his supporters care about results. 100% of his votes were based on the color of his skin, not the content of his character. No candidate has ever repudiated the ideals of Martin Luther King, Jr. like Barak Obama. It's not his fault though. He just took advantage of the degraded morality of the American electorate, a degradation born in the election of George W. Bush and expanded in his re-election. The majority of Americans have always rejected the idealism of Martin Luther King and in 2008 they elected the man that is the polar opposite of everything Martin believed in and died for. Martin's dream is dead because we now have a president who advocates everything Bull Connor believed: that if you are the wrong color you have no character. Barak Obama is the 21st century James Earl Ray.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Constitutional hurdle

The Obama Depression Extender (which he calls a "stimulus") doesn't pass constitutional muster. In fact, it doesn't even make it past the preamble, which states:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare...." thud. It just hit the wall and failed. "General Welfare" is something that benefits everyone. This 800 trillion dollar debt is not general welfare, it is particular welfare and is therefore un-constitutional. In fact, any bill with earmarks (and this one is 100% earmarks) is un-constitutional.

To those who put their hopes in the Supreme Court: do you think these empty robes will strike down this bill as un-constitutional? No...they probably think Obama is the best president we've ever had empty robe has empathy for an empty suit.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

The Leader of the Free World speaks

"The United States should take a lesson from the pages of Russian history and not exercise excessive intervention in economic activity and blind faith in the state's omnipotence. In the 20th century the Soviet Union made the state's role absolute. In the long run, this made the Soviet economy totally uncompetitive, and this lesson cost the Soviet people dearly. Nobody wants to see that repeated anywhere. Nor should we turn a blind eye to the fact that the spirit of free enterprise including the personal responsibility of business people, investors and shareholders for their own decisions is being eroded in the last few months. There is no reason to believe that we can achieve better results by shifting responsibility onto the state." ---Vladimir Putin

Why can't we find a leader like this? The best and the brightest political mind of the 21st century is the leader of......Russia?? Actually, the Russia of today is far more powerful than the Soviet Union ever was because the Russia of today is led by a man who knows what righteousness is and from where it comes and makes his decisions based on this knowledge. Glory be to God for Vladimir Putin.

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Quote from A.W. Pink

Christmas is coming! Quite so: but what is "Christmas?" Does not the very term itself denote it's source? ‘Christ-mass.’ Thus it is of Roman origin, brought over from paganism. But, says someone, Christmas is the time when we commemorate the Savior's birth. It is? And WHO authorized such commemoration? Certainly God did not. The Redeemer bade His disciples "remember" Him in His death, but there is not a word in scripture, from Genesis to Revelation, which tells us to celebrate His birth. Moreover, who knows when, in what month, He was born? The Bible is silent thereon. It is without reason that the only "birthday" commemorations mentioned in God's Word are Pharaoh's (Gen. 40:20) and Herod's (Matt. 14:6)? Is this recorded "for our learning?" If so, have we prayerfully taken it to heart?”

- A.W. Pink, Xmas (Christ-mass)

No, Mr. Pink, we have not, not even in churches that subscribe to the Westminster Confession.